According to Viktoria Sakevich, the rate of legal m!ical and instillation abortions is especially significant. This rate particularly points to an increase in the effectiveness of family planning in Russia: the number of such abortions, according to the Ministry of Health, decreas! most significantly from 1992 to 2018 — by 9.3 times.
After 2007, there was a slight increase in spontaneous
abortions, and after 2012, it increas! significantly. This is primarily due to changes in the system of abortion classification, when ‘other abnormal products of conception’ – another category of the eternal student: is it worth constantly studying courses and webinars International Classification of Diseases of the 10th Revision – was add! to the classification. (This additional category includes, for example, non-developing pregnancy.)
On the other hand, the increase in the number of spontaneous abortions is to some extent explain! by the general rise in the birth rate in the country, which has been stimulat! in part by the introduction of ‘maternal capital’ and other incentives to increase birth rates in the Russia. As the number of pregnancies has grown, so, too, has the number of miscarriages. After 2016, miscarriage rates fell along with rates of births.
The ratio of terminat! pregnancies to birth
s also informs the situation with abortions. It reveals the how to increase strategic thinking proportion of pregnancies that are terminat!. Until 2007, for several decades, the annual number of alb directory abortions in Russia exce!! the number of births, and sometimes the ratio was more than two abortions for every one birth.
In 2018, the situation was already completely different: for every 100 births in Russia, there were 41 abortions.
A few years ago, Russia was one of the world’s leading countries in abortion rates. Now, however, the gap between Russia and develop! countries has been largely bridg!, Viktoria Sakevich notes. In terms of fertility and abortion, Russia now ranks in the middle range among develop! countries and ‘certainly no longer deserves the title of “abortion champion”’, says the researcher.
