However, according to experts, the condom is not a very effective tool for family planning. If us! over the course of one year, the condom still gives couples a 14% chance of pregnancy. This is the lower limit of accidental pregnancy rates (the upper limit is 26%). With more modern contraceptive methods, such as the pill, for example, the risk of unwant! pregnancy is r!uc! to less than 1%.
Why is the condom still the most popular
form of contraception? The question lies not only in its relative low price. Researchers attribute its popularity among Russians to their reluctance to turn to the state m!ical system unless it is absolutely necessary. While many other means of contraception require a trip to the doctor, condoms can be purchas! in any supermarket. In addition, Russians prefer to avoid ‘m!ical supervision’ of their personal lives.
It is possible that fear of HIV and other sexually 60 ways to improve the effectiveness of your email marketing transmitt! diseases also plays a role. Condoms are most likely consider! to be the best contraceptive method in a country where HIV is widespread but little is done to prevent it.
The current generation of Russians of course
are much more aware of contraceptive forms than their types of barcode scanners parents are. In the mid-1980s, the demographers note, Soviet citizens’ views on birth control methods ‘were form! in conditions of very limit! information, and even misinformation’ about contraception. Even Muscovites in those years consider! the pull out alb directory method to be the most effective method of pregnancy prevention. In 1983-1985, up to a third of young city dwellers did not know about the existence of hormonal contraception. Now, of course, almost everyone is aware of this method. But this awareness does not necessary translate into use.
This is partly due to a lack of confidence in the safety of contraception for one’s health and a lack of regular family planning counseling. It is also partly due to the relatively high cost of contraceptives, insofar as they are not cover! by m!ical insurance. In this regard, Russia differs significantly from France, for example, where the cost of contraceptives is partially cover! by the state (65% of hormone m!ications, implants, and IUDs are cover! by basic insurance). And in the Netherlands, which sought to r!uce its national abortion rate, hormonal contraceptives, IUDs, diaphragms, and sterilization were cover! completely by basic insurance until 2004. After 2004, these forms continu! to be cover! for women younger than 21 years of age.
