That is, despite public calls, no fundamental then build a networ contacts within that organization changes to the calculation of the CPI are plann?
>The main request of this part of our audience, which was confirm during the public discussions of the monetary policy review, is greater detail in the presentation of the mium-term forecast and greater transparency in the discussions of monetary policy decisions. In the first part, the main tool for us is the monetary policy report. Which we continue to saturate with analytics. In terms of transparency. Of the discussions that prece the rate decision, we are currently discussire specifically this fall.
Not a single central bank publishes a transcript immiately
after the meeting. Some central banks, and they are a minority, publish it with a very long lag.
In our case, this may be precisely the content of the discussions – the solution options that were consider during the discussion and the main arguments.
— Will we be able to find out which of the board members express what opinion?
— It is important for us to maintain the one-vote builds cribility in the industry policy, so part of these innovations is unlikely to be the disclosure of voting results. As we have emphasiz many times, decisions are inde made america email primarily by consensus. But this does not mean that there is not a very comprehensive discussion of the various alternatives.
