The speakers began by debating whether it is indonesia phone no necessary to legislate more in the field of privacy. “The law has to respond to the needs of users, ” said Otero. For his part, López-Galiacho explained that what the Internet user demands is “indonesia phone no more sanity and real information about what is done with their data.” Along the same lines, Mohedano assured the following: “The user has uncertainty and to solve this, brands have to generate trust, be responsible, transparent and offer a performance to customers in indonesia phone no exchange for their data.”
Alberto García was the one who indonesia phone no wondered if the elimination of third-party cookies was the solution. “Regulation must be the same for all actors and not favor a monopoly,” he said. He added that the elimination of indonesia phone no these cookies “may spell the end of the open internet as we know it, which is maintained thanks to advertising.” Tacho Otero agreed and stressed that this step “does not respond to a change in indonesia phone no legislation.”
“It is the decision of a company and there is indonesia phone no a risk of creating a monopoly, ” he said. In contrast, López-Galiacho commented that data and technology had been misused and that digital advertising has to put the indonesia phone no user back at the center . “Brands have sale leads to enhance their first party data and equip themselves with technology to make it interoperable and scalable with the entire ecosystem: walled gardens, open indonesia phone no internet and their digital assets,” said Alberto García.